Trading term
What is Sharpe ratio?
The Sharpe ratio measures return per unit of volatility, calculated as excess return divided by the standard deviation of returns. It answers whether gains came from genuine skill or from simply taking bigger swings.
Developed by William Sharpe, the ratio takes a return series, subtracts the risk-free rate, and divides by the standard deviation of those returns. Higher is better: more reward for each unit of variability endured. Roughly, under 1 is unremarkable, 1–2 is good, and above 2 is excellent — though the figure is only comparable between strategies measured over the same period and frequency.
What it captures is the difference between two records that finish in the same place. A system that grinds out +12R with small, consistent results and one that reaches +12R through violent swings look identical on a summary line, but the first has a far higher Sharpe — and a maximum drawdown a fraction of the size. That is a real distinction, and the Sharpe ratio is the standard way of expressing it.
Its well-known flaw is that standard deviation treats upside and downside identically, so a strategy is penalised for large gains exactly as much as for large losses. The Sortino ratio, which counts only downside deviation, exists precisely to address this.
Both curves finish at +12R. One has a 0.80R standard deviation and a 1R drawdown; the other 3.83R and 5R. Return alone can't tell them apart — this ratio can.
For example
Two strategies both finish at +12R over 20 trades. The steady one has a standard deviation of 0.80R and a Sharpe of 0.75, with a worst drawdown of 1R. The volatile one has a standard deviation of 3.83R, a Sharpe of 0.16, and a 5R drawdown. Same destination, very different journey.
Go hands-on in Premium
That's Sharpe ratio in theory — it clicks when you read it on a live chart. Practise it hands-on in the TradeWize Premium Trading Psychology & Risk track.
Explore Premium →Why it matters to you
Return alone is not comparable across strategies, because it says nothing about what was risked to get it. The Sharpe ratio is the common language for that comparison — it's what allocators use to rank funds, and it's the reason a modest, steady return can be worth more than a larger and wilder one.
⚠ It punishes big winners as harshly as big losers
Standard deviation is symmetric, so a strategy with occasional enormous gains — trend following, long options — scores poorly despite that being exactly the return profile many traders want. It also assumes roughly normal returns and misses tail risk entirely, which is how strategies that quietly sell insurance post beautiful Sharpes until the day they don't.